 Editor's Note: Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, the #1 personal finance book of all time with over 40 million copies sold, has spent decades teaching everyday Americans how the wealthy actually build income. He called the 2008 housing crash before it happened, warned investors to buy gold and silver well before their historic runs, and has been pounding the table on cash-flowing assets for over 30 years. Today, he'll show you an income play funded entirely by America's oil and gas infrastructure. One that's already paying some investors $25,000 a month and is the closest thing to universal basic income that may ever exist. Click here to see the details or read more below.
Saudi Arabia figured it out. They pay their citizens $3,600 a month per family. Just for existing. Funded entirely by oil. Meanwhile, politicians in America are arguing about Twitter, while you get nothing from the $300 billion we generate from oil and gas every year. But there is a way to collect. It's called the Patriot Income Plan, or P.I.P. for short. It's not a government program. It's not a stimulus check. It's not tied to an election or a budget vote. It's direct ownership in 14 entities that control America's energy infrastructure — pipelines, terminals, processing plants — and pay 10% a year to everyone who holds units. Put in $10,000 = get $1,000 back.
Put in $50,000 = get $5,000 back.
Put in $100,000 = get $10,000 back. 42 payouts a year. Deposited automatically. This is universal basic income for people who don't want to wait around for the government to figure it out. P.I.P. is on pace to pay out $53 billion this year — a record. The next distribution drops in days. Here's how to enroll Sincerely,
Robert Kiyosaki
Editor, The Kiyosaki Letter
Special Report
Delta vs. United: Which Airline Is Better Built for Higher Fuel Costs?Authored by Chris Markoch. First Published: 7/18/2026. 
Key Points
- Delta Air Lines and United Airlines both absorbed sharply higher jet fuel costs this quarter, but Delta's earnings and margins held up better than United's.
- Delta's Monroe Energy refinery and hedging gains provided more structural fuel-cost protection than United's liquidity-based approach of raising cash reserves.
- Both airlines successfully raised ticket prices to offset fuel inflation, with Delta achieving comparable unit-revenue growth while expanding capacity far less than United.
- Special Report: Buy this stock tomorrow
Airline stocks’ sensitivity to jet fuel prices is tested whenever fuel spikes. In 2026, fuel costs are testing every airline’s balance sheet. This quarter, both Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) and United Airlines (NASDAQ: UAL) passed the test on paper. But they passed it in very different ways—and that difference matters more than the headline numbers. Delta’s adjusted fuel price rose to $3.93 a gallon, up 75% year over year. United’s was even higher at $4.19 a gallon, up nearly 80%. Neither figure is small. United took a significant year-over-year hit to adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and now expects nearly $6 billion in incremental fuel expense for full-year 2026, up from its original budget.
That’s real data that investors shouldn’t dismiss as quarterly noise. The question is which airline has the structural tools to pass those costs through to ticket prices without losing travelers. How Higher Jet Fuel Costs Are Impacting Delta and UnitedAs noted above, United’s adjusted EPS fell 48.6% year over year, from $3.87 to $1.99. Delta’s adjusted EPS fell 26%, from $2.12 to $1.56. The same pattern was evident in margin compression. United’s adjusted pretax margin fell just over six points, from 11% to 4.8%. Delta’s fell four points, from 11.7% to 7.7%. Delta’s earnings base shrank by a smaller proportion, even though both carriers faced comparable fuel inflation. To be fair, not all of the weakness in United’s EPS and margin numbers was due to fuel costs. The company absorbed $184 million in one-time labor contract charges this quarter, compared with $561 million a year ago. Delta’s Fuel Hedging Strategy vs. United’s Liquidity ApproachAt the crux of the “built for higher fuel costs” question is fuel hedging. Most major U.S. airlines walked away from large-scale fuel hedging years ago. Unlike European carriers such as Air France-KLM (OTCMKTS: AFLYY) and Ryanair (NASDAQ: RYAAY), which routinely lock in 70%–90% of their fuel needs through derivative contracts extending a year or more, U.S. legacy carriers have largely stopped using the strategy. Industry reporting has quantified the impact of that exposure, and it helps explain the problem. A 1-cent move in jet fuel can cost a major U.S. carrier roughly $50 million a year, with no derivative portfolio absorbing the blow. Delta is a partial exception because it owns Monroe Energy, a refinery in Trainer, Pennsylvania, that supplies a meaningful share of its jet fuel needs. Third-party refinery sales reached $2.09 billion this quarter, up 83% year over year, and Delta credits the refinery with an 11-cent-per-gallon benefit this quarter, including a 5-cent-per-gallon hit from a temporary outage. Delta’s earnings report showed $301 million in mark-to-market hedge adjustments and settlements this quarter alone. That’s not the 80%-plus coverage ratios seen at Ryanair or Air France-KLM, but it is meaningfully more structural protection than a pure spot-market buyer has. United’s approach is based on liquidity. Management raised $3.7 billion in new liquidity through private bank transactions this quarter, explicitly describing it as “low-cost insurance” against a further oil spike. According to sources, United has also secured select fuel supply contracts that limit some of its exposure. However, these reportedly fall well short of the large-scale, derivative-based hedging programs used by European carriers or the protection provided by Delta’s refinery model. Can Delta and United Pass Higher Fuel Costs to Travelers?Rising jet fuel costs only matter if passengers aren’t willing to pay. So far, that hasn’t been the case. United grew capacity 3.5% year over year while still pushing adjusted unit revenue (TRASM) up 12.1%. Delta grew capacity roughly 1% while pushing TRASM up 12.4%. Delta is generating comparable unit-revenue growth with a fraction of United’s capacity growth—a tighter, lower-risk version of the same pricing story. United is growing into demand more aggressively, which raises the ceiling if travel remains strong and the downside if it doesn’t. Why Travel Demand Remains Strong Despite Higher AirfaresBoth United and Delta cited increases in premium and economy or main-cabin demand. United’s Basic Economy revenue rose 11%, while its overall economy-cabin unit revenue rose 12%. That was the airline’s second consecutive quarter of positive economy growth after a long soft patch. Delta’s main-cabin ticket revenue rose 8%, also marking its second straight quarter of positive main-cabin growth, while premium ticket revenue rose 17%.
At first glance, that pattern looks contradictory. The broader travel narrative through 2025 and into 2026 has been a “K-shaped” split: strong premium demand alongside a documented pullback in budget-conscious leisure travel, with ultra-low-cost carriers absorbing the brunt of that softness. If price-sensitive travelers are genuinely pulling back across the industry, why are Delta and United both showing positive growth in their cheapest cabins at the same time?
It may come down to a shift in market share rather than a demand surge. Neither Delta nor United built its brand around the price-sensitive flyer, but both have spent recent years developing lower-tier fare products. United’s Basic Economy and Delta’s comparable main-cabin fares are designed to compete for that traveler when needed. As ultra-low-cost carriers cut capacity or struggle with their own economics, some of that traffic doesn’t vanish. It shifts “below the line” to a legacy carrier’s cheapest available seat. That would reconcile positive economy-cabin growth at Delta and United with a well-documented pullback at dedicated budget carriers. Which Airline Is Better Positioned for Higher Fuel Costs?Warren Buffett has been one of the most outspoken critics of airline stocks. Buffett’s argument comes down to high operating costs outweighing travel demand, which can be fickle. But every rule has occasional exceptions. In 2026, the airline industry is having a moment when, for now, the math is working in its favor. That doesn’t mean this time is different. It just means there’s an opportunity for growth despite higher jet fuel prices—as long as travelers are willing to absorb the higher costs. If stock-price growth is the only consideration, both UAL and DAL are attractive targets. In fact, an argument could be made that United has more short-term upside. But for investors looking for long-term growth, Delta’s hedging strategy should do a better job of protecting its margins. Plus, DAL’s dividend increased about 15%, from $0.1875 to $0.2150 per share, and will be paid on July 30, 2026, to shareholders of record as of July 9. . |
